Daniel Willingham--Science & Education
Hypothesis non fingo
  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
  • Op-eds
  • Videos
  • Learning Styles FAQ
  • Daniel Willingham: Science and Education Blog

Are decorated classroom walls too distracting?

7/3/2014

 
This column first appeared at RealClearEducation.com on June 5, 2014.

We normally expect that a kindergarten classroom will be decorated with colorful posters, maps, and student artwork. But a recent study indicated that trimming out the classroom may distract students, and compromise learning.

Headlines in the press have been not equivocated. The Telegraph, Tampa Bay Times, and Smithsonian all ran stories along the lines of “wall displays distract from learning,” while the Daily Mail asked whether they should be banned altogether. My hunch is that most kindergarten teachers and parents of kindergarteners would not agree, but it’s worth looking at why this conclusion would be hasty.

The study confirms something you likely find intuitive; if there are bright, colorful things on the wall, kids will look at them, and will do so at times that the teacher hopes their attention will be focused on something else. Hence, kids might learn less about the lesson plan in such an environment.

The study (Fisher et al, 2014) took place in a laboratory reconfigured to look like a classroom. Kids first visited on five occasions to get to know the “teacher” (i.e., researcher) and to acquaint them with the paper-and-pencil measures that would be used in the experiment. Over the following two weeks, kids listened to six read-alouds on science topics (e.g., volcanoes, the solar system) in groups. Afterwards, children answered six questions about the lesson.

During the familiarization sessions, there were a moderate number of decorations on the walls. During the experimental sessions, the walls were either bare, or quite covered.
Picture
There were two outcomes of interest: first, how kids scored on the test in each environment, and second, the frequency with which kids were distracted. Children were videotaped during the story, and they were deemed to be thinking about something else if their eyes were not on the teacher.

The results were as you would expect. Kids spent a greater percentage of time looking away from the teacher in the decorated classroom (38% of time vs. 28% of time). And kids in the decorated classroom scored lower on the assessment (42% vs. 55%).

I can see two important reasons to be cautious when interpreting these results.

First, it seems likely to me that kids would habituate to the wall decorations in time. The authors address that possibility in their paper, citing data presented at a conference (but not yet published) showing that kids distraction was above baseline levels two weeks after the introduction of a distracting classroom environment. But the abstract of the talk also says that there was significantly less distraction in week 2 than in week 1. In other words, kids were getting used to the busy environment, and might have returned to baseline soon.

Second, even if we accept that classroom decoration brings a cost to learning, we should remember that teachers have other reasons for brightening their rooms; they want the classroom to be inviting, to feel like a social environment. Would it be more difficult to build a sense of classroom community in the sterile environment? That’s at least plausible. In other words, there may be a cost to outcomes that were not evaluated in this study.

Or to put it another way, the sterile environment is the wrong control condition. How about comparing the busy environment with something that looks homier, but less stimulating:  a serene painting or two on each wall, perhaps a vase of dried flowers on a table, that sort of thing.

I think there’s a useful point for lower elementary teachers to consider here. As the lead researcher mentions in a video about the study, it seems ironic that classrooms become less decorated as kids get older, given that it’s the younger kids who have more difficulty regulating attention. But I don’t think bare walls are the way to go.

Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Seltman, H. (2014). Visual Environment, Attention Allocation, and Learning in Young Children When Too Much of a Good Thing May Be Bad. Psychological science, 0956797614533801.
Justin Baeder (@eduleadership) link
7/4/2014 03:15:53 am

Great analysis, Daniel. It also seems to me that how the walls are used would make a difference.

While most teachers decorate their walls before the school year starts, they also use the wall space in evolving ways throughout the year, to post student work, provide visual references of strategies as they're taught, and so on.

I've definitely seen classrooms where teachers have gone overboard with this (I'm not sure students can really refer to 43 strategy posters), but I don't think the study referenced above simulates how teachers actually use their wall space, and as you noted, students certainly habituate and start to tune out any "distractions."

Nicole
7/4/2014 07:49:09 am

I would also argue that it depends on what is on the walls - did they consider testing the kids on that material? I chose quite carefully what was on the walls of my classrooms, and I know kids did use the displays to check information, remind themselves of a fact, etc.

Michael Hubenthal link
7/11/2014 03:44:41 am

To me this study highlights the issue that walls may be an under (rather than over) utilized component of the classroom. It should be no surprise to anyone that over the course of a day, students' attention wonders. The question then is not "should the walls have material on it and if so how much is too much?" Rather the question should be "What are teachers providing for students to focus their attention on when it is not on the teacher or their direct assignment?"

I see this as a two-fold, interrelated problem. Classroom instructors could be more mindful and intentional about the material they hang on their walls and how they use those materials instructionally. This takes effort to keep at least some of the posters in phase with current or upcoming curricular topics, but effort that may be well worth it if given he right materials – which leads into the next issue. A related, and perhaps driving factor, is that most poster producers do a very poor job of applying what we know about multimedia design, cognition, and the realities of a classroom environment (e.g. the tend to include lots of descriptive text that is too small for students to see from their seats). These two factors combined, result in classrooms that are decorated with posters that are wallpaper, instead of posters that activate students’ attention, catalyze cognitive processing, provide a framework to guide students' construction of knowledge, and connect to extended learning through either live or web-based exploration of phenomenon.

PS> Thanks for your blog. I read it regularly and appreciate your thoughtful posts.

john kerry link
7/14/2014 06:31:53 pm

great idea and thanks for sharing.The most teachers decorate their walls before the school year starts, they also use the wall space in evolving ways throughout the year, to post student work, provide visual references of strategies as they're taught, and so on.
<a href="http://www.atees.org/">Link idea</a>


Comments are closed.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed


    Purpose

    The goal of this blog is to provide pointers to scientific findings that are applicable to education that I think ought to receive more attention.

    Archives

    April 2022
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    Categories

    All
    21st Century Skills
    Academic Achievement
    Academic Achievement
    Achievement Gap
    Adhd
    Aera
    Animal Subjects
    Attention
    Book Review
    Charter Schools
    Child Development
    Classroom Time
    College
    Consciousness
    Curriculum
    Data Trustworthiness
    Education Schools
    Emotion
    Equality
    Exercise
    Expertise
    Forfun
    Gaming
    Gender
    Grades
    Higher Ed
    Homework
    Instructional Materials
    Intelligence
    International Comparisons
    Interventions
    Low Achievement
    Math
    Memory
    Meta Analysis
    Meta-analysis
    Metacognition
    Morality
    Motor Skill
    Multitasking
    Music
    Neuroscience
    Obituaries
    Parents
    Perception
    Phonological Awareness
    Plagiarism
    Politics
    Poverty
    Preschool
    Principals
    Prior Knowledge
    Problem-solving
    Reading
    Research
    Science
    Self-concept
    Self Control
    Self-control
    Sleep
    Socioeconomic Status
    Spatial Skills
    Standardized Tests
    Stereotypes
    Stress
    Teacher Evaluation
    Teaching
    Technology
    Value-added
    Vocabulary
    Working Memory