Spring, 2013 at the Harvard Initiative for Learning and Teaching.
|
EB
8/21/2013 07:39:29 am
Great presentation. And, I hope, helpful in re-framing the "critical thinking" agenda for K-8 students. At that level, I think that critical thinking is limited to some very basic skills -- recognizing truly ridiculous statements, making comparisons based on very basic knowledge, and (I'm not a fan of this) learning to support opinions with facts, no matter how limited.
Douglas Hainline
8/21/2013 08:34:23 am
The presentation's conclusion reminds me of work done by Alan Schoenfeld in the 1980s, trying to get his undergraduate mathematics students to apply George Polya's heuristics for mathematical problem-solving. He found that simply reviewing these heuristics, getting the students to 'know' them, made little difference in their problem-solving abilities. But they could be taught. A summary of his conclusions : "Successful solution of mathematics problems depends up on a combination of resource knowledge, heuristics, control processes and belief, all of which must be learned and taught." 8/22/2013 10:16:56 am
Interesting to see the parallels between what is needed in higher ed and in K-12 to develop critical thinking skills: a curriculum that sequentially builds domain-specific knowledge. Comments are closed.
|
Subscribe to this blog
PurposeThe goal of this blog is to provide pointers to scientific findings that are applicable to education that I think ought to receive more attention. Archives
September 2016
Categories
All
|
